Named staff
Attacks on a named stylist or provider are a harassment matter, not a review
Google's contributions policy prohibits harassment and personal attacks on individuals. For a salon, reviews that call out one person by name with accusations about their character are filed on that ground with the language quoted.
Google Maps Help — Prohibited and restricted content policy for Maps user contributions
No appointment
Booking records decide whether a review reflects a real visit
Where scheduling software shows no appointment for the reviewer, the genuine-experience ground applies. That record is the single most useful thing to have in hand before opening a case.
Google Maps Help — Prohibited and restricted content policy for Maps user contributions
16 CFR Part 465
Buying reviews to bury a bad one is a federal violation, not a shortcut
Since October 21, 2024 the FTC rule on consumer reviews bans fake reviews, insider reviews presented as customer reviews, and paying for positive or negative reviews, with civil penalties available per violation. For a salon that leaves two lawful moves: earn real reviews, and report the ones that break platform policy.
U.S. Federal Trade Commission, 2024 — Rule on the Use of Consumer Reviews and Testimonials (16 CFR Part 465)
Policy grounds only
Google removes reviews that break a policy, not reviews you dislike
Google's own help documentation says any review can be reported but only content that violates its policies is eligible for removal. That is why a case starts by matching the wording to a named policy: fake engagement, off topic, impersonation, harassment, personal information or conflict of interest.
Google Business Profile Help — Report inappropriate reviews on your Business Profile