Model Rule 1.6
Replying in detail can put your license at risk
A lawyer may not reveal information relating to a representation to answer a review, and state bars have disciplined lawyers for doing exactly that in a reply. For an employment attorney, a policy report is the route that does not require saying anything about the matter.
American Bar Association — Model Rule 1.6: Confidentiality of Information
Non-clients
Opposing parties and declined consultations are a common, reportable pattern
Reviews from an opposing party, a family member of one, or someone who was turned down at intake describe something other than a customer experience, which is the off-topic and fake-engagement ground in Google's published policy.
Google Maps Help — Prohibited and restricted content policy for Maps user contributions
16 CFR Part 465
Buying reviews to bury a bad one is a federal violation, not a shortcut
Since October 21, 2024 the FTC rule on consumer reviews bans fake reviews, insider reviews presented as customer reviews, and paying for positive or negative reviews, with civil penalties available per violation. For an employment attorney that leaves two lawful moves: earn real reviews, and report the ones that break platform policy.
U.S. Federal Trade Commission, 2024 — Rule on the Use of Consumer Reviews and Testimonials (16 CFR Part 465)
Policy grounds only
Google removes reviews that break a policy, not reviews you dislike
Google's own help documentation says any review can be reported but only content that violates its policies is eligible for removal. That is why a case starts by matching the wording to a named policy: fake engagement, off topic, impersonation, harassment, personal information or conflict of interest.
Google Business Profile Help — Report inappropriate reviews on your Business Profile